ANALISIS CITRA TEKNIK PEMERIKSAAN MSCT NASOFARING DENGAN KONTRAS PADA DIAGNOSIS KARSINOMA NASOFARING MENGGUNAKAN PENYUNTIKAN MANUAL DAN INJEKTOR DI RSUD dr. ZAINOEL ABIDIN
ABSTRACT
BACHELOR OF APPLIED SCIENCE PROGRAM
IMAGING RADIOLOGY TECHNOLOGY STUDY PROGRAM
RADIODIAGNOSTICS AND RADIOTHERAPY DEPARTMENT
HEALTH POLYTECHNIC OF HEALTH MINISTRY
JAKARTA II
THESIS, 2025
SYARIFAH CHAIRUMI
ANALYSIS OF IMAGE QUALITY RESULT IN CONTRAST-ENHANCED MSCT
NASOPHARYNX EXAMINATIONS WITH MANUAL INJECTION AND INJECTOR
METHODS UNDERTAKEN AT THE HOSPITAL
V Chapters + 34 Pages + 17 Images + 2 Tables +10 Attachments
Background: diagnostically, nasopharyngeal carcinoma diagnostic challenges can be effectively
addressed through MSCT Nasopharynx examinations, which outperform conventional imaging in
determining the tumour’s location, characteristics, and staging. In this matter, MSCT imaging
combined with contrast media provides enhanced visualization of carcinoma. In relation to which,
contrast media, predominantly iodine-based, are universal agents for radiological examinations
due to their solubility in water and ease of intravenous administration. These agents are highly
effective in highlighting any abnormalities by comparing pre- and post-contrast images and
offering superior diagnostic clarity.
Research Methodology: this research applies a qualitative method with case study approach to
provide detailed insights into real-world practices. As for the data collection methods, it includes
among the other things observation, interviews, and documentation. The research relies on primary
data processed using an interactive analysis model.
Research Findings: this research concludes that in contrast-enhanced MSCT Nasopharynx
examinations obtains score 80% rated as very good, 40% as good. Thereafter, in contrast aspect, it
obtains 70% rated as very good, 30% as good. Meanwhile in the sharpness aspect, it obtains 60%
rated as very good, 40% as good. Accordingly, the results indicate that images produced using
injectors are predominantly very good in quality.
Conclusion: based on the result of respondent evaluations, it suggests that injector images appears
slightly better compared to those obtained using manually. However, the difference is not
statistically significant. In summary, this matter confirms that there is no substantial difference in
image quality between manual and injector methods in contrast-enhanced MSCT Nasopharynx
examinations.
Keywords: MSCT Nasopharynx, Contrast Media, Injector
Tidak ada salinan data
Tidak tersedia versi lain